{4 minutes to read} In other posts, I’ve often touted the benefits of working with a financial professional, either together or separately, during a couple’s divorce mediation. In this post, I want to summarize the circumstances under which I think a mediation would progress most easily, and that is if both spouses worked with a financial professional who acts as a neutral.
While the training and expertise of the financial professionals would be the same, a financial professional working as a neutral is different from a financial professional who only works with one party and only supports that person’s interests. The latter situation might arise because one party feels that the other has a superior knowledge or acumen for financial matters, and that the less knowledgeable party needs more education or help than the other. In such a case, the financial professional is an advocate for that party and definitely should not be considered a neutral, any more than either party’s attorney would be considered a neutral.
A financial neutral in mediation is more akin to the role of a financial neutral in the interdisciplinary collaborative practice model. They would work with both parties and ultimately present complicated financial concepts in a simple, easy-to-understand fashion.
Here are some other reasons why working with a financial neutral is a good idea:
If you determine that a financial neutral would be well worth the cost, your mediator can suggest professionals who can fulfill this role.